Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:11 AM // 01:11   #61
Desert Nomad
 
Chocobo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Guild: CoA
Profession: N/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

I'd trade this update for more storage. I realize that this must have taken ages to do and the ammount of effort put in would be pretty big but what for? To overshadow other peoples acomplishments? It wasn't impossible to earn titles before and it didn't need to be changed. Personally I feel as if there are so many other issues that could have been worked on instead of this. Congrats to all the PvE'rs that play though, I'm sure you are incredibly psyced about this.
Chocobo1 is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:13 AM // 01:13   #62
Furnace Stoker
 
Yawgmoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by english storm View Post
Yes what about an incubator type item but for books! It would be fantastic, the incubator type item takes one slot in your inventory but you can open it and slot in one of each book. Would be a great improvement to the game with all the books there are now imo
Sadly this is completely not possible as all the books are 'incubator type' items themselves. Or to be more accurate, the incubator is a book item too. They're all variable items able to store up to 18 bits of data, that's far far from being able to store multiple variable items in it.

So the truth is we get another load of new stuff without any way to store them. GG.
Yawgmoth is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:15 AM // 01:15   #63
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Profession: Mo/W
Default

Quote:
* The time it takes for the Vengeance of the Gods meter to fill up has been reduced by 5 minutes.
Does this not give the Kurzick side a decidedly overwhelming advantage?
Cobalt is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:16 AM // 01:16   #64
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: scotland
Guild: LOD
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobo1 View Post
I realize that this must have taken ages to do and the ammount of effort put in would be pretty big but what for? To overshadow other peoples acomplishments? It wasn't impossible to earn titles before and it didn't need to be changed. Personally I feel as if there are so many other issues that could have been worked on instead of this.
agreed, way to cheapen our accomplishments and waste time making the game easier for noobs rather than making the game work better and fix the existing problems that were actually problems. 3x max wisdom title now and 2.5x max treasure hunter..thats..so..completely useless to me
Travaail is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:16 AM // 01:16   #65
Kha
Sins FTW!
 
Kha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Guild: Angel Sharks [AS]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina Buenaobra View Post
They decided not to allow people to pay to add pages because they were concerned about the negative effects on the economy.
Negative effects on the ecomony? What about negative effects on the community? Not allowing this isn't any different than saying that my monk and assassin with Legendary Guardian don't deserve to get the same rewards as others getting the titles now, which is even a bigger slap in the face since I got it on both before such broken things like consumables and Ursan were added to the game.

And even more consumables are added to the game...

At least newer players will benefit from the great (they are great and the people who worked on them should be proud) changes of Kurz/Luxon, SS/LB titles - all I got was 2 ranks in Treasure Hunter and Wisdom and more slaps in the face for having been a loyal supporter of the game and its campaigns when they were new. Kind of reminds me of the time I bought monk vabbian to be the first to have it and then immediately regretted ever wanting to get something right away...

Edited to add:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sora of the Divine View Post
That would bring so much gold into the game that it would damage the economy insanely. I'd probably get at least 50k, if not more, so multiply that times ~1.5 million that actually still play..
Which would have been already in the game if this was thought up when the titles were first added. But now it's pretty much a way to keep money out of the game by hurting people who have already done the work. So the philosophy here is reward people for doing things months, years even after a many of the others have already done them?
__________________

Last edited by Kha; Nov 14, 2008 at 01:28 AM // 01:28..
Kha is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:17 AM // 01:17   #66
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Jecht Scye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Guild: Lucky Crickets[Luck]
Profession: N/Me
Default

As someone who already has many titles maxed - Thank you for the time and effort you've put into this update Anet. So far, on paper, it looks wonderful. Alliance Faction might actually be fun to gather again, and this gives me many more opportunities to hold more diverse events that help more people in my guild in the future.

Love the update Linsey and company, keep up the good work. Also, thank you for getting it done today. I know it takes alot of long hours and difficult work to do this kind of a massive update. My expectations were GREATLY exceeded.

Quote:
Does this not give the Kurzick side a decidedly overwhelming advantage?
possibly not. I recall back in the day when more people played competitive missions that the Luxons had a huge advantage with their Seige Turtles. This hasn't been the case recently, because there are so few players in Aspenwood that leechers go relatively unnopposed, and almost every game seems to have at least one. If the number of people picks up again, this could be a balance fix. Otherwise, you might be right.

Last edited by Jecht Scye; Nov 14, 2008 at 01:19 AM // 01:19..
Jecht Scye is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:18 AM // 01:18   #67
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Profession: R/
Default

I wholeheartedly agree with the spirit of this update, and greatly appreciated ArenaNet's efforts.

On to the complaining!
Actually, my only complaint is that I seem to have encountered a bug. I have four characters that have completed both Befriending quests, and most of which have beaten at least some of the missions mentioned in the notes. Unless I am gravely mistaken, I should received credit for all of these towards raising my faction caps. After logging in with all characters, my Kurzick cap is still 33,000 and my Luxon cap is still 27,000. If I am not mistaken, that should be more like 50K+ for each faction. Has anyone else run into issues here? Am I just insane? Did I misread the update notes?
Arainach is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:19 AM // 01:19   #68
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Guild: [IG]
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina Buenaobra View Post
They decided not to allow people to pay to add pages because they were concerned about the negative effects on the economy.
I like most of the changes but having to redo every single mission on my almost there Legenday Guardian ? Not a hope in hell's chance.

Also the faction gain was 50% lost due to the losing the other sides faction when trading in. Would have thought a slightly different methodology could have been found to stop this.

What effect on the Economy btw ?
Aldric is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:20 AM // 01:20   #69
Krytan Explorer
 
Leighwyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seattle
Guild: Limbo
Profession: Mo/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kha View Post
Negative effects on the ecomony? What about negative effects on the community? Not allowing this isn't any different than saying that my monk and assassin with Legendary Guardian don't deserve to get the same rewards as others getting the titles now
This...I don't understand their logic here.
Leighwyn is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:20 AM // 01:20   #70
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
doudou_steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Guild: Guildless QQ
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kha View Post
Negative effects on the ecomony? What about negative effects on the community? Not allowing this isn't any different than saying that my monk and assassin with Legendary Guardian don't deserve to get the same rewards as others getting the titles now, which is even a bigger slap in the face since I got it on both before such broken things like consumables and Ursan were added to the game.

And even more consumables are added to the game...

At least newer players will benefit from the great (they are great and the people who worked on them should be proud) changes of Kurz/Luxon, SS/LB titles - all I got was 2 ranks in Treasure Hunter and Wisdom and more slaps in the face for having been a loyal supporter of the game and its campaigns when they were new. Kind of reminds me of the time I bought monk vabbian to be the first to have it and then immediately regretted ever wanting to get something right away...
Oh shut up. Anet is trying their best to please every one of us so the least you can say is Thank you Anet for your efforts.

Nothing can be perfect so accept it.
doudou_steve is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:20 AM // 01:20   #71
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Default

very good update

there are still 2 points that disturb me :

1) they gave us kurzick AND luxon faction at the same time... it's totally free faction, but you have to sacrifice half of what they gave you to use the other half

2) books are not retroactive
Bug John is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:20 AM // 01:20   #72
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Bibblenorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: Miendrak'el Myrth [MeM]
Default

I know it has been mentioned... but gaining Kurz and Luxon faction at the same time is concerning... I logged in with 3 chars before I realized... 30k kurz vs 24k lux...

I am afraid if I cash it in now, that they will fix it and I will lose it.
It would also hurt if they don't fix it...

I do like the update... but it hurts a little.
Bibblenorn is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:21 AM // 01:21   #73
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Lest121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: Army of Darkness
Profession: A/Mo
Default

Hahaha to FFF, nice update Anet.
Lest121 is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:22 AM // 01:22   #74
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Nanood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Supermans Crystal Palace
Guild: Legion Of The Dark Sun
Default

This is all so awesome. Goes to show how much attention the devs pay to fun times. So much here that makes the game worth playing through.

Hugs and kisses for all the goodness.
Nanood is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:23 AM // 01:23   #75
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: scotland
Guild: LOD
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina Buenaobra View Post
They decided not to allow people to pay to add pages because they were concerned about the negative effects on the economy.
if you're worried about the economy why not fix the way overpowered farming build that is perma shadowform?
Travaail is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:23 AM // 01:23   #76
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yawgmoth View Post
Sadly this is completely not possible as all the books are 'incubator type' items themselves. Or to be more accurate, the incubator is a book item too. They're all variable items able to store up to 18 bits of data, that's far far from being able to store multiple variable items in it.

So the truth is we get another load of new stuff without any way to store them. GG.
Then just modify it so that the incubator contains a pointer to another incubator, or whatever. It's not rocket science.
Phineas is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:24 AM // 01:24   #77
Jungle Guide
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Default

We didn't get any storage with GWEN which had the worst inventory clutter and they just added 10 more books... haha, I find that kind of amazing.
IlikeGW is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:25 AM // 01:25   #78
Desert Nomad
 
NeHoMaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

We now need a STORYBOOK CONTAINER, so you can put all in one inventory slot.
NeHoMaR is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:26 AM // 01:26   #79
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Guild: Stars of Destiny
Profession: E/
Default

I'm really sad about this update. There are some of us who have been playing loyally and thoroughly for years. These books will force me to do all the title work I already did again to be able to do anything with them and thanks for wasting even more already precious inventory slots with non-stackable books.

To top it off, I don't even know if it's worth it because they don't tell you what a full book will be worth and they kept the cap so damn high.

Adding the kurz and luxon faction is nice to retro fit what quests we've done. But stupidly they give them to us at the same time, so when we donate one, the other goes down and makes it pointless.

Ridiculous, too long to wait until gw2 and now to punish those who have been playing all this time is a slap in the face. Add me to the "i'm out of here" group of whiners. Thanks for the pointless update and loss of a huge fanbase.
Cherno is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2008, 01:26 AM // 01:26   #80
Frost Gate Guardian
 
nvmu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldric View Post
What effect on the Economy btw ?
Ya i'm gonna have to agree with you, i don't foresee it being much worse than what ursan and sf did to the economy
nvmu is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Update - Monday, November 10, 2008 Nessar The Riverside Inn 31 Nov 13, 2008 01:07 AM // 01:07
A11Eur0 The Riverside Inn 142 Nov 11, 2008 04:24 PM // 16:24


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17 AM // 05:17.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("