Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Mar 02, 2010, 06:15 PM // 18:15   #41
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Guild: ODWC
Profession: Rt/Me
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

I have a Sin. Yes I have used SF. No, I have never done UWSC or any other SC. I use mostly a Rit.
There..got that all out of the way.
I have been lurking the forums for quite some time now. Even before i actually joined guru. I actually think that working with new skills is fun and very enjoyable. However, It is my opinion that the folks who cried so much about SF never have done SC's, etc. These people probably never would have either. Why do they care so much about what other people do? I don't..
For those people, it's usually about dumbing down everything so they can get what they want. The typical leveling of the playing field. For those people an "A" for effort is what they want, I suppose. You get a medal for trying...or in this case, titles, HoM, etc...not for actually achieving. Seems indicative of our culture in the U.S. today.

Let the elites of the game play as they play. And as for the rest of us...Let's try to get better if you want to obtain titles, HoM, ecto or whatever it is you want.

My two cents
Shut A You Face is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 06:28 PM // 18:28   #42
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shut A You Face View Post
I have a Sin. Yes I have used SF. No, I have never done UWSC or any other SC. I use mostly a Rit.
There..got that all out of the way.
I have been lurking the forums for quite some time now. Even before i actually joined guru. I actually think that working with new skills is fun and very enjoyable. However, It is my opinion that the folks who cried so much about SF never have done SC's, etc. These people probably never would have either. Why do they care so much about what other people do? I don't..
For those people, it's usually about dumbing down everything so they can get what they want. The typical leveling of the playing field. For those people an "A" for effort is what they want, I suppose. You get a medal for trying...or in this case, titles, HoM, etc...not for actually achieving. Seems indicative of our culture in the U.S. today.

Let the elites of the game play as they play. And as for the rest of us...Let's try to get better if you want to obtain titles, HoM, ecto or whatever it is you want.

My two cents
Actually, most of the people whining about SF being overpowered were against the dumbing down of the game. Once someone elses playstyle effects yours directly it becomes a problem. Shadow Form as it was dumbed down the game a lot, in fact Shadow Form as it is still dumbs down the game a lot, tanking really, really dumbs down what Guild Wars is.
Orry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 06:33 PM // 18:33   #43
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Default

More QQ... I would have never expected this
Shadow Feathers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 06:45 PM // 18:45   #44
Forge Runner
 
snaek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: N/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reaper with no name
SF and 600/Smite were not farming builds.

Farming builds are, by their very nature, limited in scope. 55 is an example. In certain areas, it dominates everything it meets. However, if you try to use it as a general PvE build...the results aren't pretty.

This is a good thing. 55 should not be touched for this reason.

However, SF and 600/Smite weren't like this. They dominated most of the game, and often did it better than entire parties (admittedly, SF was much worse in this regard). That is not farming. That is taking a hammer and smashing PvE into little bitty pieces with it.
this right here invalidates op's point. you say anet wants to provide fun for everyone? how does forcing everyone to roll a sin accomplish this? at least ursan let you play whatever class you wanted. at the peak of sf, the gw mentality was: "sin or gtfo"
snaek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 06:59 PM // 18:59   #45
Hall Hero
 
Bryant Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

Man I remember the days when ANet actually tried to prevent farming, those were interesting times...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Pierson View Post
The recent mess only confirms we're on the wrong track now. All in the name of balance, just like the inquisition did things in the name of god, they're just beliefs of a fanatic group. It's no secret that it is the people who scream the loudest that seem to be the most intolerant for a differing point of view. And that's not what GW needs. Did the TK play a huge role in that? I don't know, but if they did, Anet should let them go and take control in own hands again.

I sincerely hope Anet realises their mistake and will make certain play styles less dull again, like 600/smite.

Thank you.
Some would consider that we've been off the track for years on end now. I personally feel that if a fraction of a party is able to go into an area and be successful that something is wrong, either with the enemy composition or with the balancing of skills.
Bryant Again is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 07:30 PM // 19:30   #46
Grotto Attendant
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A little chalet outside Drok's
Guild: Natural Born Killaz
Default

Soooo....Which A-Net employee is a reincarnation of Torquemada?

Inquisition = Bad thing. Lots of people tortured and burned at the stake.
Latest Skill Update = Good thing. Fixed a major problem with the game, and the only thing that got burned (sort of) was a GW box.

Seriously, though - restoring Elite areas to the point where they deserve the title "Elite" is much better for the game than leaving them (UW) the joke they turned into thanks to the different "god modes" that were out there.
Kook~NBK~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 07:34 PM // 19:34   #47
Forge Runner
 
Gun Pierson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belgium
Guild: PIMP
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snaek View Post
this right here invalidates op's point. you say anet wants to provide fun for everyone? how does forcing everyone to roll a sin accomplish this? at least ursan let you play whatever class you wanted. at the peak of sf, the gw mentality was: "sin or gtfo"
First year after release, people were solo farming griffs, hydras, troll cave, ethins, avicara and UW with warriors, monks, eles, necros, you name it. And that was before sins were even born. Not to forget rangers who could barrage whole areas on their own. Nobody was excluded, except maybe the mesmers.


EDIT: And nobody cared, because all the cool kids were playing PVP.

Last edited by Gun Pierson; Mar 02, 2010 at 07:59 PM // 19:59..
Gun Pierson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 07:37 PM // 19:37   #48
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cause you think I troll doesn't make my point less valid
Guild: We Roll Pros [POD]
Profession: A/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryant Again View Post
Some would consider that we've been off the track for years on end now. I personally feel that if a fraction of a party is able to go into an area and be successful that something is wrong, either with the enemy composition or with the balancing of skills.

I completely agree with you. A Massive Multiplayer Online RPG should be exactly that. Different classes work in different areas for different purposes, players should work together towards a common goal, and playing an online game like a console game killed any type of love I had for PvE in Guild Wars.

EDIT: What I'm trying to say is that people themselves killed the fun of it, and A-Net let this go by un-noticed and are now doing something too late to fix it. Leave the 'I can do this solo' ego at the door when you play an online team based RPG next time. That was directed at the elitists.

Last edited by The-Bigz; Mar 02, 2010 at 07:41 PM // 19:41..
The-Bigz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 07:42 PM // 19:42   #49
Forge Runner
 
snaek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: N/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gun pierson
First year after release, people were solo farming griffs, hydras, troll cave, ethins, avicara and UW with warriors, monks, eles, necros, you name it. And that was before sins were even born. Not to forget rangers who could barrage whole areas on their own. Nobody was exluded, except maybe the mesmers.
exactly, and you still can mostly--but everyone chose to farm with sf/600 instead because it was broken. thats why sf/600 was bad, and thats why sf/600 was nerfed. so whats your point?

Last edited by snaek; Mar 02, 2010 at 07:44 PM // 19:44..
snaek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 07:46 PM // 19:46   #50
Raged Out
 
MMSDome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Pierson View Post
Some of you need to be reminded what GW stands for and that it's not all about the way you play only.

This has been Anet's view for years:
'ArenaNet tries to keep the game fun for everyone while still providing fun and rewarding play for solo farmers.'

The recent mess only confirms we're on the wrong track now. All in the name of balance, just like the inquisition did things in the name of god, they're just beliefs of a fanatic group. It's no secret that it is the people who scream the loudest that seem to be the most intolerant for a differing point of view. And that's not what GW needs. Did the TK play a huge role in that? I don't know, but if they did, Anet should let them go and take control in own hands again.

I sincerely hope Anet realises their mistake and will make certain play styles less dull again, like 600/smite.

Thank you.
God forbid you need to learn a new build.

Hope you enjoy this update, I know I do!
MMSDome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 07:47 PM // 19:47   #51
Forge Runner
 
Cuilan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Profession: Me/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMSDome View Post
God forbid you need to learn a new build.

Hope you enjoy this update, I know I do!
Pretty much sums it up for solo-farmers. Thanks, MMSDome.
Cuilan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 07:52 PM // 19:52   #52
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Lest121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: Army of Darkness
Profession: A/Mo
Default

Nerf 55 monk build too.
Lest121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 07:59 PM // 19:59   #53
Academy Page
 
Aldo wants more's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, UK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snaek View Post
exactly, and you still can mostly--but everyone chose to farm with sf/600 instead because it was broken. thats why sf/600 was bad, and thats why sf/600 was nerfed. so whats your point?
I can take your point with regards to SF, but the 600/smite argument doesn't hold for me. 600/smite is a duo/trio team build and is not invicible like the previous versions of SF.

Did those of us that enjoyed 600/smite duo/trio really affect your gameplay? Personally I didn't make my sin Perma as i enjoy playing with others, and that just so happened to be in the form of 600/smite.
Aldo wants more is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 08:02 PM // 20:02   #54
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldo wants more View Post
I can take your point with regards to SF, but the 600/smite argument doesn't hold for me. 600/smite is a duo/trio team build and is not invicible like the previous versions of SF.

Did those of us that enjoyed 600/smite duo/trio really affect your gameplay? Personally I didn't make my sin Perma as i enjoy playing with others, and that just so happened to be in the form of 600/smite.
600/smite ran a lot of dungeons, that affected my gameplay quite a bit by reducing those that i could form a group to actually attempt to play it with.
Orry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 08:13 PM // 20:13   #55
Jungle Guide
 
Tullzinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Trying to stay out of Ryuk's Death Note
Profession: N/R
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orry View Post
600/smite ran a lot of dungeons, that affected my gameplay quite a bit by reducing those that i could form a group to actually attempt to play it with.
Really? So you were forced to 600/smite or did you hook up with like minded people and complete any area you wanted.

I will say that you may be the first person to actually come closes to answering my question of how others using XXX build may affect someone.
------------------------------------------------------------------
But there is an issue with general PUGs failing most of the time. Memories of Thunder Keep come to mind way back in the day. I cannot count the amount of Pug fails over that mission.

Last edited by Tullzinski; Mar 02, 2010 at 08:19 PM // 20:19..
Tullzinski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 08:16 PM // 20:16   #56
Desert Nomad
 
tmakinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: www.mybearfriend.net
Guild: Servants of Fortuna [SoF]
Profession: E/
Default

Well, spirit spamming is still your one-size-fits-all solo farming solution, I can't say that I'm seeing any noticeable difference after the minor nerf.

Other than that, my preferred approach to particular builds breaking 'elite' content would be to adjust that content instead of the builds, since loot scaling already takes care of the normal content. Something like this has been tried on some occassions but I've got the feeling that the applied solutions weren't anywhere near optimal.
tmakinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 08:23 PM // 20:23   #57
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: DMFC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reaper with no name View Post
SF and 600/Smite were not farming builds.


See the difference? There is nothing wrong with farming. If Anet really had a problem with it they would have nerfed SoS into the ground, or killed 55 monks.



Dont forget w/n raptor farmers - how long before they get swiped at by anets nerfbat of pain ?
And why is it most of the ppl qq`ing now about sf are the same ppl who qq it was too op - must be bad 1 minute to be gloating about sf nerf then waking up next morning and finding out it still exists
Spiritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 08:31 PM // 20:31   #58
Academy Page
 
Aldo wants more's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, UK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orry View Post
600/smite ran a lot of dungeons, that affected my gameplay quite a bit by reducing those that i could form a group to actually attempt to play it with.
Whenever we want to do dungeons and don't want to/can't run it with 600/smite we only have to ask our guildies and alliance for volunteers to make a team. Did you ask yours?
Aldo wants more is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 08:39 PM // 20:39   #59
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tullzinski View Post
Really? So you were forced to 600/smite or did you hook up with like minded people and complete any area you wanted.

I will say that you may be the first person to actually come closes to answering my question of how others using XXX build may affect someone.
------------------------------------------------------------------
But there is an issue with general PUGs failing most of the time. Memories of Thunder Keep come to mind way back in the day. I cannot count the amount of Pug fails over that mission.
For the most part i haven't been able to complete most dungeons, and most people just tell me to "get a run" if I try to LFG X Dungeon
Orry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 02, 2010, 08:45 PM // 20:45   #60
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldo wants more View Post
Whenever we want to do dungeons and don't want to/can't run it with 600/smite we only have to ask our guildies and alliance for volunteers to make a team. Did you ask yours?
I like running things with PUGs, but if none form due to people getting runs there is a problem. I do ask my alliance for help, that is how i completed the dungeons that I do have done.
Orry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 AM // 08:12.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("