Curse

MajestycMage · Sep 17, 2006, 12:34 AM // 00:34

I was just wondering, what antivirus software fo you think is the best?

Thanks in advance.

Malice Black · Sep 17, 2006, 01:02 AM // 01:02

Avast IMO it runs quietly in the background and doesn't take a lot of resources.

makosi · Sep 17, 2006, 01:06 AM // 01:06

^ Agree. I've been using Avast for months now. In the past I've paid for Norton and McAfee but sometimes I think they over-do it to make it seem like a worthwhile purchase. I just want an anti-virus programme that shuts up and does its job which Avast does.

It uses minimal resources and self-updates regularly without making a big deal out of it.

Malice Black · Sep 17, 2006, 01:11 AM // 01:11

Also its wise to run 2 anti-virus because even the best miss things on occasion.

I use a freebie one as a second virus checker, it has on occasions picked up something Avast hasn't.

Eldin · Sep 17, 2006, 01:16 AM // 01:16

I use Norton, which is decent, though there are some issues with subscriptions and updates at times. I also use Ad-Aware in addition, as Norton is primarily intended for virus removal, and not adware/spyware.

If I was an adult, I'd be using Avast as well (heard good things about it), but my dad pays for Norton, so no reason to waste his money.

Refyused · Sep 17, 2006, 01:51 AM // 01:51

I don't recommend Norton/Symantec, or McAfee. AVG and Avast are alright, however I prefer nod32. There is also a very good Anti-Virus at www.freeav.com (I THINK that's AVG).

Malice Black · Sep 17, 2006, 01:55 AM // 01:55

How "safe" is this freeware though? I've had freeware that has contained adware before...these days I just buy a retail version.

Hockster · Sep 17, 2006, 02:02 AM // 02:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Admins Bane

Also its wise to run 2 anti-virus because even the best miss things on occasion.

Not entirely true. Never have two active AV apps running simultaneously. They invariably conflict with each other causing more gaps in coverage. A second one for scanning only is fine, but never have them both active.

http://forums.pcworld.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4101&sid=f8253033d139b7f3c5120d849 acfbc5e

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=27706

llsektorll · Sep 17, 2006, 02:03 AM // 02:03

i've been using avast on because it was recommened by my bro... used it for a year then realized Win32.Tenga destroyed my entire pc while all avast could do is just remind me it is there... i don't recommend avast to anyone... there is a reason why the home edition is free its because it sucks especially with the updates....

ive been through many antiviruses after that situation like
kaspersky
Pandasoft
Pcillin

norton and symantec are only good for corperations with their antivirus logs and other server client features. For homes they are just overhyped.

Nod32 has a very good virus detection algorithm but a weak firewall... best way to eliminate a virus is to never have got it in teh first place

i find that bitdefender internet security is the best protection because it stops the virus from ever being loaded... no antivirus is strong in all points

as for bitdefender its has a lack luster spyware detection .. though most poeple use a seperate spyware detector anyways...

its compact runs in a the background very smooth system and updates quietly (damn did i hate that annoying avast voice saying "virus database has been updated" crap) every 3-5 hours. Has one of the best firewall/antivirus combo i've run across... its not free so just give me a pm to get the url for the download and the keygen. Its a small 18mb download.

Malice Black · Sep 17, 2006, 02:06 AM // 02:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hockster

Not entirely true. Never have two active AV apps running simultaneously. They invariably conflict with each other causing more gaps in coverage. A second one for scanning only is fine, but never have them both active.

http://forums.pcworld.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4101&sid=f8253033d139b7f3c5120d849 acfbc5e

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=27706

That's what i meant, phrased it wrong that's all.

Tarun · Sep 17, 2006, 02:10 AM // 02:10

I know techs everywhere who recommend avast. There are a few who recommend Norton, but it just shows what they know when they come to myself or other techs.

NOD32 is the best payware AV because it complains about EVERYTHING. "A temp file was created. THIS IS A VIRUS AND ALL ACCESS HAS BEEN BLOCKED." -- NOD32.

avast all the way, it has the best detection rate out there and is free.

Churchie · Sep 17, 2006, 02:30 AM // 02:30

Nod32 imo is one of the best av's around.

Lynxius · Sep 17, 2006, 03:07 AM // 03:07

Updates are almost instant and doesnt cause too much lag when playing, its the best Anti-Virus ive ever used anyway, im sure many will agree.

Avast! Click this red text

Refyused · Sep 17, 2006, 03:11 AM // 03:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Admins Bane

How "safe" is this freeware though? I've had freeware that has contained adware before...these days I just buy a retail version.

It's great.. It's a company who's out to help users protect their PC rather than profit from it, basically. No adware, spyware, ads, etc..

Loviatar · Sep 17, 2006, 03:22 AM // 03:22

when actually tested avast never seems to be in the running.

for antivirus PC magazine recommends AVG FREE over paid competitors

Maximum PC magazine in this months utilities issue recommended................AVG FREE

updates are usually no more than a day apart and going 2 days without an update is rare

people who actually test them side by side say AVG FREE

EDIT FOR LINK

http://free.grisoft.com/doc/1

Karil The Tainted O · Sep 17, 2006, 03:23 AM // 03:23

I personally use Norton Protection Center and Webroot Spy Sweeper. They work really well for me, they also block ads and pop-ups.

Lynxius · Sep 17, 2006, 03:24 AM // 03:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Refyused

It's great.. It's a company who's out to help users protect their PC rather than profit from it, basically. No adware, spyware, ads, etc..

Yep, i agree, freeware is usually for the win.
Honest and caring people they must be, working for free and all.

By the way i suggest this thread is Stickied, could be helpfull for new users seeking protection/stability when playing Guild wars.

Avast for example will give you very litle lag.

Loviatar · Sep 17, 2006, 03:30 AM // 03:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eldin

I use Norton, which is decent, though there are some issues with subscriptions and updates at times. I also use Ad-Aware in addition, as Norton is primarily intended for virus removal, and not adware/spyware.

If I was an adult, I'd be using Avast as well (heard good things about it), but my dad pays for Norton, so no reason to waste his money.

AdAware is free but the latest testing shows it has gone to junk rating.

in testing it missed keyloggers/rootkits that the top 2 got

the top 2 were
SPYWARE DOCTOR was top
SPYSWEEPER was right behind

spybot made a rotten showing as well

awesome sauce · Sep 17, 2006, 04:12 AM // 04:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hockster

Not entirely true. Never have two active AV apps running simultaneously. They invariably conflict with each other causing more gaps in coverage. A second one for scanning only is fine, but never have them both active.

http://forums.pcworld.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4101&sid=f8253033d139b7f3c5120d849 acfbc5e

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=27706

So if i have windows defender running and mcafee thats bad?

Spike · Sep 17, 2006, 04:12 AM // 04:12

AVG free is good. But I've been useing McAfee for so long now I don't remember when I started. And so far I have yet to see anything get past it. My Pc is permantly online and I have never got a virus or anything else.