Nov 08, 2008, 08:45 AM // 08:45
|
#1
|
Guest
|
Hmmm. I like Pix.
so the question is...
dime for dollar, which/who/what takes the best images.
I'm no Rockefeller, Bohemian, Bilderberg, not gonna capture monies and counterfeit.
Hmmm...figure like, what $300 usd?
I have a Nikon, but it's like. old. (the film is in the icebox)
so that leaves us with...3oo. help. and no. no printers, all digital. ty.
|
|
|
Nov 08, 2008, 09:14 AM // 09:14
|
#2
|
La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo
|
When it comes to DSLR cameras, out of my collection, I'm personally in love with my D40x. Won't score one for as low as $300 unless you get lucky and find one used that isn't somehow defective or otherwise not worth purchasing (though you can easily find them from $400-$500 or so), but it's an excellent camera.
__________________
Stay Breezy
|
|
|
Nov 08, 2008, 10:04 AM // 10:04
|
#3
|
The Fallen One
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oblivion
Guild: Irrelevant
Profession: Mo/Me
|
Canon and Nikon are pretty much the best of the bunch in the DSLR category. However, at only 300 USD as top of the budget, you will be hard pressed to get a DSLR (and as Faer pointed out, if you do find one, it most likely won't be in good condition).
Your best bet is to get a point and shoot. In that catagory, Panasonic, Olympus, Casio, and Sony make great models (Sony has Zeiss on their side, but their image technology is the worst of the bunch, so it is a give/take)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16830180151
^ Is a really nice point and shoot with excellent reviews on many sites.
|
|
|
Nov 08, 2008, 06:38 PM // 18:38
|
#4
|
Technician's Corner Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The TARDIS
Guild: http://www.lunarsoft.net/ http://forums.lunarsoft.net/
|
http://www.circuitcity.com/ccd/Searc...=90000141+&c=1
Tons of people have recommended the above linked camera to me, so I bought it. Eagerly awaiting it's arrival.
|
|
|
Nov 08, 2008, 08:54 PM // 20:54
|
#5
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Guild: I Will Never Join Your Guild (NTY)
Profession: R/
|
Are you actually looking for a DSLR? If so, $300 is not going to cut it.... Canon and Nikon are widely considered the top of the line for that market.
What do you really need the camera for? Don't go and buy one with tons of features that you will never ever use and may not even know what are. So many ppl buy a camera with 35 bells and whistles and they never take it off "Easy" mode. lol
My personal recommendation (unless you are using it professionally), is to not worry about the MegaPixels (anything over 6 is overkill) and spend the money on a good optical zoom, image stabilization and a quality lens... next to that is a good clear LCD and the rest is just frills for the most part.
The best thing to do if you're not sure is read lots and lots of reviews, both by the pros and the Joe Sixpacks out there.... get an idea of what the general public thinks about the camera that they own and use before you go and buy it. :d
|
|
|
Nov 12, 2008, 08:36 AM // 08:36
|
#6
|
Guest
|
meh. point and shoot. Polaroid.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Hmmm...
|
Captain Arne Is PRO |
The Riverside Inn |
25 |
Oct 23, 2007 01:16 AM // 01:16 |
Am I the only one? Hmmm
|
Valon |
The Riverside Inn |
43 |
Nov 15, 2006 08:12 PM // 20:12 |
Hmmm....
|
Lazarus |
Questions & Answers |
3 |
Jul 29, 2006 06:15 PM // 18:15 |
Hmmm wonder how much
|
Bowstring Badass |
The Riverside Inn |
2 |
Mar 08, 2006 02:28 AM // 02:28 |
hmmm
|
woesla |
The Campfire |
3 |
Oct 21, 2005 05:42 PM // 17:42 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 AM // 00:21.
|