May 05, 2005, 02:15 PM // 14:15 | #1 |
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Which gear is better?
Ascalon gear or upgraded ringmail? For example, Ascalon Gauntlets vs. Ringmail Gauntlets.
Ascalon Gauntlets Armor: 35 Reduces damage from attack Armor + 10 (from physical attacks) Ringmail Gauntlets Armor: 50 Amor + 20 (from physical attacks) So the ringmail has better armor rating but the ascalon has reduce dmg. Which one is better for a W/Mo? Armor defense over damage reduce, or damage reduce over armor defense? |
May 05, 2005, 03:04 PM // 15:04 | #2 |
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
bump.
|
May 05, 2005, 03:35 PM // 15:35 | #3 |
Academy Page
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Ringmail is better.
|
May 05, 2005, 04:01 PM // 16:01 | #4 |
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
I read somewhere on here yesterday that the damage reduction from the Ascalon armour is applied regardless of where you are hit, but it does not stack if you have mulitiple pieces of it.
so if you get ascalon boots and the ringmail for everything else you'll the damage reduction no matter where you are hit and the weak armour only on your feet. |
May 05, 2005, 10:48 PM // 22:48 | #5 |
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Michigan
Profession: R/
|
but what exactly is "redueces damage from attacks"?
|
May 06, 2005, 12:16 AM // 00:16 | #6 |
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: May 2005
|
Does Ascalon equipment just look better to some people? I always thought ringmail was actually stronger, yet cheaper in supplies.
|
May 06, 2005, 01:23 PM // 13:23 | #7 |
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
It's damage reduce. Say you take 10 dmg but since the armor has that, you only take 8 dmg maybe.
|
May 06, 2005, 01:57 PM // 13:57 | #8 |
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TX
Guild: Crimson ScS
Profession: W/N
|
It dosent stack, just grab ascalon boots or gloves and you have the basicly the whole set.
|
May 06, 2005, 02:46 PM // 14:46 | #9 | |
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 AM // 05:32.
|