Nov 09, 2006, 09:11 PM // 21:11 | #1 |
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Nov 2006
Profession: W/E
|
probably a dumb question, but......
which has the potential to deal out more damage in a single hit, ranger or warrior?
|
Nov 09, 2006, 09:18 PM // 21:18 | #2 |
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Returning after a 50 month break. Hi.
Guild: None
Profession: R/
|
A single skill - ranger with barrage on group of monsters, regular attack - warrior
|
Nov 09, 2006, 09:40 PM // 21:40 | #3 |
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: R/
|
depends on how many enemies are around you.
Cyclone or Triple chop can hit all enemies around you in melee range. Barrage can only hit up to 6? |
Nov 09, 2006, 09:45 PM // 21:45 | #4 |
Site Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2005
Profession: R/
|
Yeah, barrage is 6. Realisticaly tho, how many foes can get around a warrior?
|
Nov 09, 2006, 10:34 PM // 22:34 | #5 |
Forge Runner
Join Date: Jan 2006
Guild: Stars of Destiny
Profession: E/
|
The same amount you can get around any class. You've seen uw solo/duo runs? You can get quite a few enemies around you.
|
Nov 10, 2006, 12:05 AM // 00:05 | #6 |
Academy Page
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Single hit - no skill? Warrior. The hammer hits for 19-35 which is the highest for a single hit.
Single skill on one target? Probably an axe warrior. Single skill on multiple targets? Toss up between ranger and axe warrior. However, damage is complicated subject. It depends on your weapon, your skill level for the weapon, the level of the foe, what armor they are wearing, and more. Some people mentioned the axe and multiple hits. Max damage on axe and bow are both 28. The average on the bow is better with minimum the damage being 15 and the axe having a minimum damage of only 6. That puts the average for the bow at 21 and the axe at 17. If it were that simple? But no, now you have to figure in the level of strength for the warriror as that adds 1% of armor penatration per level. We could go on... All that said, in the past all the computations done show the warrior with the highest damage per second over time. Period. |
Nov 10, 2006, 01:06 AM // 01:06 | #7 |
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Guild: Banished Dragons
Profession: A/
|
But a decent ranger should have no bother taking care out a warrior
|
Nov 10, 2006, 02:44 AM // 02:44 | #8 |
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: south mississippi
Guild: Warriors Of Melos WOM
Profession: E/N
|
A ranger has its good points but in the same token a Warrior has theirs. As far as pure brute damage the Warrior beats out the ranger. If you want to talk subltiys then the ranger rules. It all depends on the build, a good build can mean the difference between ruling and beign ruled.I have played both classes, and they both are very good. Just choose how you like to fight. Long range the Ranger rules over a warrior. For close combat the Warrior wins hands down. It all comes down to your play style on how effective your class is.
Mega Mouse |
Nov 10, 2006, 05:35 AM // 05:35 | #9 |
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Since NF came out though the dervish hits pretty hard too. The max damage for a scythe is somewhere around 9-42, plus they can hit 3 people at once without any special skills, but they gotta be right next to each other.
|
Nov 10, 2006, 06:54 AM // 06:54 | #10 |
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: allience of allied allies
Profession: R/N
|
Rangers own in my oppinion....Im a ranger.....lol
|
Nov 10, 2006, 07:54 AM // 07:54 | #11 |
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wasting away again in Margaritaville
Guild: [HOTR]
|
Ranger is probably better at quick spikes because he doesn't have to charge up adrenaline, but eviscerate probably does more damage in one hit than pretty much anything else.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 PM // 13:30.
|