Jun 23, 2008, 09:33 PM // 21:33 | #1 |
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Antidote Signet Vs. Mending Touch
With the June 12 update, would you now consider [antidote signet] to be superior to [mending touch] on a warrior?
|
Jun 23, 2008, 09:40 PM // 21:40 | #2 |
Desert Nomad
Join Date: May 2007
Location: living room
Profession: N/
|
its a matter of your build, if its not too energy intensive you can use mending as it will also provide a bit of healing, but then again wars arent known for thier energy, another thing is wars mainly use a condition removal to remove blind which is the main thing a self removal is used for. also poison is prob one of the most coomon maybe next to daze and/or blind so as the sig removes it i would have to go with the sig being supoerior now with the update
|
Jun 23, 2008, 09:56 PM // 21:56 | #3 |
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Our Crabs Know True [LOVE]
Profession: R/
|
Better recharge time, and no energy cost, so yes. Only problem it encounters is if you need/want to remove 2 conditions like Cripple, Deep Wound, and Cracked Armor. Blind is the biggest problem for a warrior, but not the only one. Mending Touch will remove ANY 2 conditions. Antidote Signet will only remove 1 condition on top of the Blind/Poison/Disease.
So, as long as you are only worried about 1 condition outside of the 3 (Blind, Poison, Disease), then yes, it is better. If you need to remove 2 conditions other than those 3, Mending Touch is better. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:07 PM // 18:07.
|