Curse

silvershock · Aug 25, 2007, 05:44 PM // 17:44

Should the HoM be account based?

My answer: yes, if it is do able for Anet, since asking for something that can't be done is not needed.

What's your answer? Yes? No? UGGABUGGAA? Or maybe something else?

Be sure to leave it^^

Lucifer PVP · Aug 25, 2007, 05:52 PM // 17:52

YES it should be

Jongo River · Aug 25, 2007, 05:53 PM // 17:53

Yes. Players shouldn't be pressured into focusing on only one character.

Zorgy · Aug 25, 2007, 05:54 PM // 17:54

I dont mind.....HoM is ONLY for SHOW OFF.......& self satisfaction

wetsparks · Aug 25, 2007, 06:03 PM // 18:03

Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes...(I think I might have gone a bit overboard with that answer.)

Atom · Aug 25, 2007, 06:05 PM // 18:05

Yes. At the very least, the minipets should be account based.

Blackest Rose · Aug 25, 2007, 06:09 PM // 18:09

yes absolutely yes - help put people who play all professions on different toons on a level pegging with those who just play 1 toon.

ubrikkean · Aug 25, 2007, 06:13 PM // 18:13

Yep, I've rationed out so many of my accomplishments to different characters on my account...

ubrikkean · Aug 25, 2007, 06:13 PM // 18:13

Ew, sorry for double post ^^

Eldin · Aug 25, 2007, 06:24 PM // 18:24

This has been brought up so much in a 24 hour period, and personally I've been answering to it quite a bit in this 24 hour period.

...

...

...

...YES!

erfweiss · Aug 25, 2007, 06:30 PM // 18:30

Yes. I have 8 characters each with 1 or more sets of 15k armor (different professions).

NotAgOat · Aug 25, 2007, 06:31 PM // 18:31

Yes it should. Tbh I don't know how ANet even screwed that up in the first place...

Evil Cobra · Aug 25, 2007, 06:48 PM // 18:48

I Agree HoM should be account based not Charactor based,

This game when it first came our prouded itself on being the type of game you can go in and play for an hour and then feel like you have done something worth in that time of play.

Arena Net making HoM charactor based just doesnt make sence. To unlock everything in HoM on all your charactors would take a long time.

Players have spent time getting all things like mini pets but to have them customized to one char is rediculous.

What they should do is to change it to Account based so when you add a mini pet in HoM it customises it to your account so any one of your chars can use them after you have added it in HoM. Also make it so you can store your pets in your Halls of Monuments like storage. Then you can just take out or put back the ones you want. Saves space in your bags no need to carry all of them about.

That sounds like a much better system then what its like at the moment.
hopefully it will be changed in a patch.

helldrik · Aug 25, 2007, 07:05 PM // 19:05

YES,
HoM should be account based, or at least the minipet thing... make all other character of the same account unable to use/register is really weird...

so YES, /signed and whatever

AceeBlueEagle · Aug 25, 2007, 07:13 PM // 19:13

Yes. Anything less than account based is failed attempt.

Personette · Aug 25, 2007, 07:27 PM // 19:27

Yes, it most definitely should be.

WinterSnowblind · Aug 25, 2007, 07:34 PM // 19:34

It doesn't really bother me.

I plan on having more than one character in GW2 anyway, and it would be nice if my new GW2 Ranger character for example, could take over from my original current Ranger. Otherwise it's only one single character that can get the benefits. The only thing I can see that should be account based, is the mini-pets, but I've never been too interested in them anyway.

thelessa · Aug 25, 2007, 07:34 PM // 19:34

Yes, it should be account based!

Zeek Aran · Aug 25, 2007, 08:54 PM // 20:54

WinterSnowblind: Didn't they say at most they only reserve names for GW2? You don't get the armor, weapons, or anything like that I'm pretty sure.

OP: Duh. They sell character slots, every campaign comes with extra characters, why the hell should I only play one?

Solar_Takfar · Aug 25, 2007, 09:47 PM // 21:47

yes, and here's why:

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10190360