Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > Explorer's League

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 05, 2007, 04:19 PM // 16:19   #101
Jungle Guide
 
Darksun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Guild: Karr's Castle
Profession: W/E
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesamurai
And yet, i'm the one that has NCSoft backing for a Guild Wars radio show huh? yeah, cos I don't know what i'm talking about... and i rest my case and walk away
Wow, you actually proved you aren't being objective.
Next time you "rest your case" use information that is relevant to the discussion, not epeen out of left field.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasuke The Betrayer
They aren't gonna leave us hanging like this, either, ANET will probably add in Sorrow's Furance size updates for free. Also, I can't even say that HoM is completed yet. You still can't rearrange properly, a "pet" stable would be awesome (Doubt about this though), and they will probably add in more weapons in the valor monument, as everyone isn't happy with the destroyer weapons. Also, you cant buy a game and expect EVERYTHING you wanted out of it.
I don't know about a Sorrow's Furnace size update, and the reasons I listed are hardly "EVERYTHING I wanted out of it". I'm pretty sure they will update HoM somehow, they are definitely doing hard mode. I dunno, I really like everything so far (except the armor) so the general response is "well then it's worth it" but I'd like to be realistic with my money & the worth of things. If Prophecies is going to be $50, I don't know if EotN really warrants the $40. The price is so close, but the content isn't. I was waiting for the "customize your character" & "character development past level 20" stuff. I got reskined armor & some nice standalone stuff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordakai
Is $40 too much, but $30 is OK? Are we really haggling over $10?

The strange thing is, obviously a lot of time was spent getting new music, new voice actors (which are really good, especially Vekk), nice new graphics...
I think the point is the content/price ratio from Chapter to expansion. Something feels wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordakai
and then Anet shot themselves in the foot with bad armor reskins, with reputation requirements to boot. I have to wonder if the Armor and weapon skins were better in GWEN, would there be less complaining? (oh, and more ways to get reputation points would be nice, too).
lol from me there would be. Customizing my character (visually, weapon wise, titles, and hopefully NEW ways to personalize ) is the whole game to me.

Last edited by Darksun; Sep 05, 2007 at 04:46 PM // 16:46..
Darksun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 05:00 PM // 17:00   #102
Furnace Stoker
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Profession: E/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordakai
Bottom line: Anet needed money to continue to work on GW2.

Is $40 too much, but $30 is OK? Are we really haggling over $10?

The strange thing is, obviously a lot of time was spent getting new music, new voice actors (which are really good, especially Vekk), nice new graphics...


and then Anet shot themselves in the foot with bad armor reskins, with reputation requirements to boot. I have to wonder if the Armor and weapon skins were better in GWEN, would there be less complaining? (oh, and more ways to get reputation points would be nice, too).
£10 is quite alot to some people! Thats quite a few items of shopping, food, clothes and alike that are more important then computer games. Plus its several pints and more money to spend entertaining friends when you go out for meals.

So im quite happe to squabble over £10 myself.

Buts its not about how much we were willing to pay. I probably wud have paid more for the expansion, because I love GWs. Its the fact we spent that money thinking we'd get more then we did.... and we didnt get an astounding amount.
freekedoutfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 05:16 PM // 17:16   #103
Furnace Stoker
 
Lonesamurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cheltenham, Glos, UK
Guild: Wolf Pack Samurai [WPS]
Profession: R/A
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darksun
Wow, you actually proved you aren't being objective.
Next time you "rest your case" use information that is relevant to the discussion, not epeen out of left field.
yeah ok, cos its not being Objective to start a Guild Wars radio show now and actually get backing for it from NCSoft if i thought there wasn't a good call for it and life left in the game? This is my own business too and real money rides on it, do you seriously think I would intentionally back guild Wars if i thought for one second that it was a waste of my time and possibly a bad business decision on my part to do so?
Lonesamurai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 06:54 PM // 18:54   #104
Jungle Guide
 
Darksun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Guild: Karr's Castle
Profession: W/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesamurai
do you seriously think I would intentionally back guild Wars if i thought for one second that it was a waste of my time and possibly a bad business decision on my part to do so?
IT'S EXACTLY MY POINT! Because you are riding on it, of course its going to be hard for you to be objective when it comes to this topic.

I love Arena Net. I think it's a great company. I want to work for them, I'm still trying to. It doesn't mean that everything they do is perfect, and it doesn't mean that I think that the price difference between the campaigns & the expansion is equal to the content difference between the campaigns & the expansion. Knowing the quality of what the Arena Net team is capable of seeing all the reskins, & faction requirements, the similar looking dungeons & strange choices on the HoM makes it worse.

One thing I will say is the Outdoor environments are killer, and the new weapons (not the Destroyer ones) are really nice.

Last edited by Darksun; Sep 05, 2007 at 07:10 PM // 19:10..
Darksun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 07:05 PM // 19:05   #105
Grotto Attendant
 
Mordakai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kyhlo
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freekedoutfish
£10 is quite alot to some people! Thats quite a few items of shopping, food, clothes and alike that are more important then computer games. Plus its several pints and more money to spend entertaining friends when you go out for meals.

So im quite happe to squabble over £10 myself.

Buts its not about how much we were willing to pay. I probably wud have paid more for the expansion, because I love GWs. Its the fact we spent that money thinking we'd get more then we did.... and we didnt get an astounding amount.
What does GWEN cost in £? £17.99 or something?

(yep http://www.101cd.com/101CD/Games_Pro...ES-NCS44185-IM)

According to this http://www.xe.com/ucc/convert.cgi

17.99 GBP =36.3435 USD

It's $39.99 here, so about the same. Maybe it's a bit much. Anyway, Anet doesn't pick the price, NCSoft does, so maybe Jeff Strain thought it would sell for $29.99.

Who knows?

Last edited by Mordakai; Sep 05, 2007 at 07:10 PM // 19:10..
Mordakai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 07:10 PM // 19:10   #106
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Guild: Today Is Not The Last Day [xDay]
Profession: W/Mo
Default

GW:EN is a very expensive and bad product. (Re-skinned Armors and very snubs weapons skins GG Anet).
neo_bpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 09:31 PM // 21:31   #107
Krytan Explorer
 
Lucifer PVP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Guild: Refuge From Exile [RFE] Refuge-From-Exile.com
Profession: W/Mo
Default

so total i have spent on guildwars .. 6:50 a month give or take... gwen is fine. Wow is what like 15 bucks a month plus you have to pay for each expansion.

GW 29 months $190
Wow 29 month $435 @ 15 a month

gw looks fine to me. If you really all want to be cheap asses ... try diablo 2 .. or better yet the best free game dungeon runners

Last edited by Lucifer PVP; Sep 05, 2007 at 09:33 PM // 21:33..
Lucifer PVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 10:04 PM // 22:04   #108
Ancient Windbreaker
 
quickmonty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

Too much money for what we got, but ANet has to survive until they release GW2. If you intend to play GW2 think of it as an investment to pay the ANet employees until then.
quickmonty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 11:05 PM // 23:05   #109
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Default

I paid $50/Prophecies, $50/Factions, $50/Night Fall, $40/GW:EN * 2 (Spouse Also)... When I first got Prophecies my compters didn't handle the game so well so 2 * $500 systems got me rocking... All in all I got about $1,380 into this game I figure... Money well spent IMHO... I have had many hours of fun playing this game and will have many more hours of fun in the future... I have to give Anet it's props for a GREAT game... However, GW:EN... Underwhelming IMHO...

Last edited by Kinky Elf; Sep 05, 2007 at 11:19 PM // 23:19..
Kinky Elf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 05, 2007, 11:08 PM // 23:08   #110
Ascalonian Squire
 
Stormer_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: Digital Knightz
Profession: W/Mo
Default

Personally I do feel it was over priced. But I'm basing this opinion on what we have come to expect from Anet. In comparison we got ripped. I'm not just referring to the length of the expansion pack, but primarily the quality...
Stormer_99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 05:18 PM // 17:18   #111
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Default

the standard had been lowered by gwen. but hey SHINY NEW MINIPETS omg will solve everything
acidic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 05:41 PM // 17:41   #112
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Sihaya Syme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Belgium, Europe
Guild: Grenth's Rejects [GR]
Profession: N/Me
Default

I had to spend 35 euro's, and I'm starting to regret it

20 would have been better.
Sihaya Syme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 06:15 PM // 18:15   #113
Krytan Explorer
 
Mineria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Denmark
Guild: Dragonslayers Of The [Mist]
Profession: W/Mo
Default

In terms of no monthly fee, I think the price is fair enough.
I guess a little more content will be added to GW:EN, they just didn't reach to complete it upon the release.
Just look how much Anet has added to the other campaigns way after they got released. And that for no additional costs at all.
Mineria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 06:27 PM // 18:27   #114
Krytan Explorer
 
hurric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: BC
Default

I did the preview and spent 5 bucks on it but I think i'ts better to lose 5 than 35 more. I was a huge guild wars fan (and still am of original chapters) but GWEN totally killed it for me. If this is the direction they're going with GW2, I'm pretty much done with them. I'll still play original GW.

Gwen flaws:
- GRIND, no missions, more grind and a ton of stuff recycled such as bad armors, bad weapons
- over priced for the content relatively speaking to other chapters. (no doubt about it)
- HoM is a failure (customization char based, minis, pvp titles etc.)
- as someone mentioned new heros but nothing new added they do the same thing
- I'm definitely no fan of using stupid bear/wolf whatever form and hate idea of bears shooting arrows with a bow. That's just ridiculous
- 1 on 1 matches are kind of fun but no big deal These should've already been added as mini games while you wait in AB for so long
- Grind is really what killed me and the new races are totally not doing it for me. I really liked GW because of all human char. Once you add Dwarves, etc. what other game does it remind you of?

everyday I'm more convinced I'm not going to buy GWEN because I barely played in the preview weekend (did most of quests but the fun factor was out of it,, felt like work)

and people should stop saying oh because there's no monthly fee, they can have it overpriced. That's no justifications. One of selling points of GW was that it has no fees but people still buy 2nd accounts and extra char slots and CE. That's no reason to price it this way. With the huge gap between GWEN and GW2, I would've been much happier to get a new chapter instead.

If not that, things like Hard mode, elite missions, etc are what keeps people playing more no re-skins and grind. A lot of people may disagree but i liked the chapters much better. No new professions because it's already hard enough to keep it somewhat balanced but a better map than 12 or whatever dungeons. Norn reputation, asura reputation, what fun do you get from doing these or killing the guy at outposts a million times (priests giving bounty in NF was a better idea)

Last edited by hurric; Sep 06, 2007 at 06:36 PM // 18:36..
hurric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 06:37 PM // 18:37   #115
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Profession: Mo/E
Default

The price is fine, cheaper then a full chapter plus a free bonus mission pack and bonus items for 35 euro?

I've already played EN longer then I have Bioshock which was 15 euro's more and took me less then 50 hours to complete with all endings.

Oh yeah I keep forgetting, its all about l33t armors and weapons, who cares about actually playing the game ;(

Quote:
Originally Posted by hurric
everyday I'm more convinced I'm not going to buy GWEN because I barely played in the preview weekend (did most of quests but the fun factor was out of it,, felt like work)
Impressive write up considering you've barely played the preview event and can sum up the entirity of EN by that....sounds like an informed decision.

Last edited by Tijger; Sep 06, 2007 at 06:40 PM // 18:40..
Tijger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 06:43 PM // 18:43   #116
Krytan Explorer
 
hurric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: BC
Default

I played as much as preview let me (not 100% but enough to get a good idea) I did play it but not because I wanted to. I did most of what it let me do so I can't say I played the full game because i didn't buy it but as much as I saw, i was not impressed but repulsed by it.
hurric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 06:59 PM // 18:59   #117
Jungle Guide
 
farmpig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Default

I enjoyed every second of the game. Looks like money well spent to me lol. BTW chao gloves looks horrid.
farmpig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 07:00 PM // 19:00   #118
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Profession: Mo/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hurric
I played as much as preview let me (not 100% but enough to get a good idea) I did play it but not because I wanted to. I did most of what it let me do so I can't say I played the full game because i didn't buy it but as much as I saw, i was not impressed but repulsed by it.
So dont buy it but dont post in a topic about it being too expensive because if you are repulsed by it then even $5 would be too much.
Tijger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 07:15 PM // 19:15   #119
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesamurai
yeah ok, cos its not being Objective to start a Guild Wars radio show now and actually get backing for it from NCSoft if i thought there wasn't a good call for it and life left in the game? This is my own business too and real money rides on it, do you seriously think I would intentionally back guild Wars if i thought for one second that it was a waste of my time and possibly a bad business decision on my part to do so?
You have what is called a "conflict of interest." The correct, legally prescribed tactic in such a situation is to SHUT THE HELL UP. Your opinion on any matter related to the game is irrelevant and, if publicly aired in an unofficial capacity, dangerously unethical, because you have a vested economic interest in specific outcomes, unlike the rest of the people posting.
fripple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 06, 2007, 07:39 PM // 19:39   #120
Krytan Explorer
 
Mineria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Denmark
Guild: Dragonslayers Of The [Mist]
Profession: W/Mo
Default

Quote:
- GRIND, no missions, more grind and a ton of stuff recycled such as bad armors, bad weapons
Dungeons,lots of side quests.
And there are some new weapon skins.
There is a mesmer armor I will go get in GW:EN, because it just looks good.

Quote:
- over priced for the content relatively speaking to other chapters. (no doubt about it)
I did not cost the same price as a campaign.

Quote:
- HoM is a failure (customization char based, minis, pvp titles etc.)
HoM will be revamped, Im like 99% sure of that.

Quote:
- as someone mentioned new heros but nothing new added they do the same thing
And? For those who don't have nightfall its nice.
Plus some of them look better then my old ones.

Quote:
- I'm definitely no fan of using stupid bear/wolf whatever form and hate idea of bears shooting arrows with a bow. That's just ridiculous
Your opinion....

Quote:
- 1 on 1 matches are kind of fun but no big deal These should've already been added as mini games while you wait in AB for so long
Its all about the fun.

Quote:
- Grind is really what killed me
r4 by quests/dungeons, little bit grind for r5(armor), you need r9 or higher?

Quote:
and the new races are totally not doing it for me. I really liked GW because of all human char. Once you add Dwarves, etc. what other game does it remind you of?
Prophecies, ever been in the Shiverpeaks?
Oh, and you can only play your old characters, you cant make new ones, and neither another race...........

Quote:
everyday I'm more convinced I'm not going to buy GWEN because I barely played in the preview weekend (did most of quests but the fun factor was out of it,, felt like work)
How did you play it?
I liked the quests and storyline, and diving into the dungeons.

Quote:
and people should stop saying oh because there's no monthly fee, they can have it overpriced. That's no justifications. One of selling points of GW was that it has no fees but people still buy 2nd accounts and extra char slots and CE. That's no reason to price it this way. With the huge gap between GWEN and GW2, I would've been much happier to get a new chapter instead.
It is not overpriced. No monthly fee is a good thing when you think about how much work puts into GW. I mean the updates, adding new content with those as well etc.
People buying 2nd accounts, extra character slots etc. has nothing to do with it at all. Wrong argument in the wrong place.

Quote:
If not that, things like Hard mode, elite missions, etc are what keeps people playing more no re-skins and grind. A lot of people may disagree but i liked the chapters much better. No new professions because it's already hard enough to keep it somewhat balanced but a better map than 12 or whatever dungeons. Norn reputation, asura reputation, what fun do you get from doing these or killing the guy at outposts a million times (priests giving bounty in NF was a better idea)
First one doesn't make sentence, first you complain over grind, and then you say it is part of what keeps people play....?
The NF bounty grind is the same thing, just gives less except you do it in hard mode.
Mineria is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:18 PM // 20:18.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("