Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > Gladiator's Arena

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 08, 2008, 02:43 PM // 14:43   #221
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: May 2006
Guild: Super Kaon Action Team [Ban]
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR
If you rely purely on splinter farming then you have probably already given the other team the damage bonus.
Only a fool would rely purely on splinter farming. But what's that got to do with my post?
Kaon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 02:56 PM // 14:56   #222
JR
Re:tired
 
JR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akaraxle
True, although it's not like GoE mesmers are particularly healthy...
I didn't mind them in their old shape, it's not like it was a particularly dominant template (pun lolz). They are probably a bit too strong now though...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaon
Only a fool would rely purely on splinter farming. But what's that got to do with my post?
The main reason why I hated the splinter/ancestors combo was that it was such a strong one trick pony. Play defensively untill VoD then win. Now you are at least still encouraged to split and gain an NPC advantage before VoD, though I'm not saying splinter is fine by any means.
JR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 03:32 PM // 15:32   #223
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Guild: Rebel Rising [rawr]
Profession: W/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR
The main reason why I hated the splinter/ancestors combo was that it was such a strong one trick pony. Play defensively untill VoD then win. Now you are at least still encouraged to split and gain an NPC advantage before VoD, though I'm not saying splinter is fine by any means.
But what you got now are builds that do both, split while playing defense and splinter farm. .. essentially reaping the benefits from both worlds with no risk involved.
ChopChop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 07:08 PM // 19:08   #224
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Farin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: Delta Formation [DF]
Profession: W/
Default

nerf splinter and ancestor's already :x
Farin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 07:34 PM // 19:34   #225
Just Plain Fluffy
 
Ensign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Guild: Idiot Savants
Default

Can someone point me to a game on obs where NPCs are being splinter farmed?
__________________
Don't argue with idiots. They bring you to their level and beat you with experience.
Ensign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 07:52 PM // 19:52   #226
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Burton2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A cardboard box in England
Guild: Men Of Substance [YMCA]
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

Glyph of energy is back to a 10 recharge. Anyone know what other skills got changed?
Burton2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 08:10 PM // 20:10   #227
JR
Re:tired
 
JR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burton2000
Glyph of energy is back to a 10 recharge. Anyone know what other skills got changed?
Pretty sure that was the only change.
JR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 08:19 PM // 20:19   #228
ArenaNet
 
Andrew Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington
Guild: Zealots of Shiverpeak [ZoS]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burton2000
Glyph of energy is back to a 10 recharge. Anyone know what other skills got changed?
There was also a bug with Power Lock fixed, but other than that for this update, that is the only skill change. We are still evaluating the balance update, however, and more changes are likely to follow.
Andrew Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 08:23 PM // 20:23   #229
Forge Runner
 
Shuuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Guild: Guildless
Profession: Me/
Default

Well, there are surely no arguements over increasing it's recharge back.
Shuuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 08:53 PM // 20:53   #230
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Cirian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: European Union
Guild: The Amazon Basin
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirian
What I'd like is for the flagstand and NPC count to re-enforce each other, so that you have to manage both resources.
Why is this better than a VoD without that mechanic, where morale and NPCs are both essential resources that are worthwhile on their own merit instead of creating a multiplicative advantage to polarize VoD even more?
Are they both worthwhile on their own merit right now? If so then fine, but why is Izzy tinkering with VoD mechanics?

Something else to think about is keeping the resources balanced against current and future play styles. What better way could be guaranteed than by linking them if there's only 2 resources? Do you have a future proof idea?
Cirian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 09:42 PM // 21:42   #231
ArenaNet
 
Andrew Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington
Guild: Zealots of Shiverpeak [ZoS]
Profession: Mo/
Default

I posted this in another thread, but it seems to be relevant here as well:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Patrick
The designers want to encourage more movement and aggressive play in GvG, rather than an 18minute stalemate at the flag stand. With blockweb + Splinter Weapon Nuke, GvG was essentially a ~20minute endurance match where most of the action took place between 18 and ~21ish minutes.

The designers are looking for changes that make the battle prior to VoD more important/exciting, and in turn, more fun. Though we are aware that balance may have been shifted too far from Flagstand/Morale to NPC advantage. We are evaluating the changes to try to find the right balance between the importance of the flagstand/morale and NPCs.
Andrew Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 10:56 PM // 22:56   #232
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Guild: Dark Alley [dR]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Patrick
I posted this in another thread, but it seems to be relevant here as well:
The balance has been insanely shifted to the base. I would trade morale for one archer. GG 40% damage.
langola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 11:12 PM // 23:12   #233
Age
Hall Hero
 
Age's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: California Canada/BC
Guild: STG Administrator
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Patrick
I posted this in another thread, but it seems to be relevant here as well:
How long would you like a tourney to go on for 30 or less?
Age is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 11:21 PM // 23:21   #234
ArenaNet
 
Andrew Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington
Guild: Zealots of Shiverpeak [ZoS]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Age
How long would you like a tourney to go on for 30 or less?
It's not a matter of how long a battle takes (although with the ATS it does need to end by the time limit heh) it's a matter of what is going on during the duration of the match. With blockweb, quite often it felt like both teams were really just killing time waiting for VoD when the match really started. While the split-centric meta certainly has it's down sides, I will say it has made the first 18 minutes of the match much more important/fun than the previous meta did.
Andrew Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 11:30 PM // 23:30   #235
Desert Nomad
 
Ec]-[oMaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Ont.
Guild: [DT][pT][jT][Grim][Nion]
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Patrick
While the split-centric meta certainly has it's down sides, I will say it has made the first 18 minutes of the match much more important/fun than the previous meta did.
Again I agree Andrew, but at this point in time I don't think there is any denying the fact that the VIO buff is just way too much, think we've covered it in the other thread that currently there is just NO merit to building for 8v8(besides map factor, regardless of the VIO effect, party d and party heal have all been buffed and or ignored, that screams just as much incentive to run better mobile/diverse templates than previously, also DON'T forget, the team that has more NPC's regardless of VIO still already has the upper hand when NPC's receive a dmg bonus every minute till the game ends... splits tend to keep splitting even in vod if they have a brain, because that equates to less dmg and heal resources left on the 8v8 build....
Ec]-[oMaN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 11:40 PM // 23:40   #236
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Kanishka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
Guild: Clan Acciaio [AcO]
Profession: Me/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Patrick
The designers want to encourage more movement and aggressive play in GvG, rather than an 18minute stalemate at the flag stand. With blockweb + Splinter Weapon Nuke, GvG was essentially a ~20minute endurance match where most of the action took place between 18 and ~21ish minutes.
The fault is in the blockweb, IMHO. It shouldn't be so easy to turtle. There are too many party-wide defense layers. The new VoD/ViO mechanics are not addressing that issue; they rather reduce strategic options (i.e. you ha to split or gg).
Kanishka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 11:50 PM // 23:50   #237
ArenaNet
 
Andrew Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington
Guild: Zealots of Shiverpeak [ZoS]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ec]-[oMaN
I don't think there is any denying the fact that the VIO buff is just way too much
And it is likely it will be adjusted. I tend to agree with you that having NPCs with +40% damage and getting +15% damage for your party members from one dimension of the game (NPCs) is quite a huge buff vs +10% MB for holding morale. Like I said, the designers are trying to find the right balance between protecting your base/attacking your enemies base and holding the flag stand. We are gathering feedback and assessing the changes to determine what needs to be tweaked.
Andrew Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 08, 2008, 11:57 PM // 23:57   #238
Yue
The Cheese Stands Alone
 
Yue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: A Chair
Guild: Delta Formation [DF]
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
The designers want to encourage more movement and aggressive play in GvG, rather than an 18minute stalemate at the flag stand. With blockweb + Splinter Weapon Nuke, GvG was essentially a ~20minute endurance match where most of the action took place between 18 and ~21ish minutes.
You don't fix that by buffing splits to the point where people are forced to run dedicated splits. Fix the skills that cause that to happen, namely splinter weapon. The original blockweb was hardly a problem. PreLOD nerf you can fit in enough shutdown to deal with blockweb 8v8. After LoD nerf, you can't because you're forced to run a source of party heals.

Added on to that, even if you tried to split with a balanced build, people could typically hold against a collapse long enough with the partygon for the rest of their team to arrive. So, instead, people run dedicated splits that implemented broken mechanics (ex: shadow stepping).

So what's the problem? Instead of nerfing the partygon, it got buffed. The updates to party healing with divine healing and LoD is decent. Everything else is pretty retarded, especially the VoD change since it promotes playing either defensive as shit keeping up all your npcs until vod or dedicated splitting. And nerf to power leak? Wtf? It was overpowered, but a nerf to it's recharge time would have been enough. Maybe a drop it a few energy, but other than that, it's fine.

Quote:
While the split-centric meta certainly has it's down sides, I will say it has made the first 18 minutes of the match much more important/fun than the previous meta did.
I'm sure you had alot of fun playing against sin split for 18 minutes before vod last monthly. Ups, you didn't play in the last monthly.
Yue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 09, 2008, 12:05 AM // 00:05   #239
ArenaNet
 
Andrew Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington
Guild: Zealots of Shiverpeak [ZoS]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yue
you didn't play in the last monthly.
An unfortunate truth, but it is certainly not because I don't want to participate. http://www.guildwars.com/competitive...ibleguilds.php

Last edited by Andrew Patrick; Feb 09, 2008 at 12:09 AM // 00:09..
Andrew Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 09, 2008, 12:10 AM // 00:10   #240
Jungle Guide
 
Zuranthium's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Guild: Black Rose Gaming [BR]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuuda
Well, there are surely no arguements over increasing it's recharge back.
Meh, I think it was good at 7 sec recharge. Just needs to be tied to Energy Storage (and perhaps killed for non-Elementalists...there are so many other Mesmer Elites out there that should really be seeing play).

~Z
Zuranthium is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LifesRestorer Gladiator's Arena 164 Nov 14, 2007 01:17 PM // 13:17
Ecks The Campfire 8 Jun 16, 2007 10:30 AM // 10:30
New skill update Patccmoi Gladiator's Arena 170 Apr 23, 2007 05:37 AM // 05:37
9/14 Skill Update onigiri The Campfire 37 Sep 21, 2006 11:39 AM // 11:39
what make cause a skill to change during Skill Balance update? leoknight Questions & Answers 10 Feb 08, 2006 05:19 PM // 17:19


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 PM // 12:22.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("