Originally Posted by Jonas The Keen

lol Lux that's awful.

I've been having mediocre luck on a hammer warrior, but really if I run into a hexer or a B bot that knows how to spam skills and a decent healer that can red bar it doesn't really matter how good I am.

Originally Posted by jaximus

as for your comment about hammer >> axe>> sword. i disagree with you about the hammer vs axe. sword is pretty meh, maybe pressure if you play it right, i agree. if you have good micro, its just a matter of preference. yes hammer has kds, but so does axe IF you can land your bulls. (i emphasize if because soooo many warriors cant). a perfect q knock with a hammer is great, but with all the b stance monks out there you need wild throw, and with wild you lose shock, you know, the always there for you kd(the one you dont need to attack through anti melee hexes to charge adrenaline for). if you micro well with axe, and d-chop things, you are extremely effective. axe lets you play much better pressure also, and in ra you can easily over pressure a monk if you play right. and im not talking p rage, too many people dont kite in ra, so i use evis. many people underestimate the power of d chop in the hands of a competent warrior. its all about micro. if you are good at stance micro and skill usage frenzy isnt a liability. a lot of hammer wars i see dont q knock, so they are wasting a huge effectiveness of the build. and unless you micro right on a hammer, you are much less effective than axe. but if you have good micro on both, its just a matter of preference. i have trained myself extensively on both, and am very confident in my micro abilities. i find axe to be more effective because of the enormous pressure i create.