Curse

bisurge · Aug 09, 2008, 11:20 PM // 23:20

Which one is better?
I know Monks have a variety of choices and can farm almost anything (almost). But Necromancers can farm in the Underworld, and despite it being nerfed, they still make a ton of cash.

So which is better, 55 Monk or 55 SS Necro?

jiggles · Aug 10, 2008, 12:25 AM // 00:25

where are you farming? Kinda helps alot

bisurge · Aug 10, 2008, 12:28 AM // 00:28

Tyria. But I can farm in the UW (but I'm afraid of the life stealing some monsters have :P).

FengShuiDove · Aug 10, 2008, 12:51 AM // 00:51

Monk is more overall versatile. Don't forget that a Monk can run Mo/N, still be more resilient, and use SS or SV for stronger offense.

Flightmare · Aug 10, 2008, 12:55 AM // 00:55

Well monks are more flexible and can be deployed in more areas, whereas necro's do more damage if mastered well.

bisurge · Aug 10, 2008, 02:24 AM // 02:24

Thanks. Since I'm a beginner 55 farmer, I'll go with Monk, and maybe have a Necro secondary.

Spiritz · Aug 10, 2008, 08:42 AM // 08:42

Technically for survivability 55 monk is better on the one hand but on the other hand 55 necro will deal more damage.
I have both and also a 55 mesmer ( got bored one day and fancied a laugh ) but i use them in different places - 55 monk in gok/bergen/fahranur ( anywhere with undead ) but 55 necro i use sometimes for solo boss and a few other places.
55 monk with sv and necrosis if you have nightfall is a gd mixture.
There is a thread somewhere to do with a necro farming guide and that covers 55 necro and that may help with where/which to farm with.
Some will say why have 1 when you can have both