Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > The Campfire > Farming

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Nov 26, 2008, 12:34 AM // 00:34   #1
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: Hi Jinx Rage
Profession: W/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default HM vs NM Lockpicking

I have seen a few things relating to this topic, but none of them have really answered my questions of which is more cost effective and how many chests can be opened with a stack of lockpicks based on your retain rate. So I decided to just work it out on my own. However I was somewhat surprised with the results at first then they started to make more sense. I would like to throw this out and have some other eyes look it over. Does anyone see any problems with my assumptions or logic?



All of my assumptions are shown on the sheet. If your HM vs NM retain rates are not in increments of 5 you should be able to just interpolate between columns for a rough estimate.

PS, if this post should be in another area, mods feel free to redirect me to the proper place.
skarhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2008, 01:46 AM // 01:46   #2
Forge Runner
 
Icy The Mage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Profession: E/
Default

I vote to sticky this, also, I see no errors in your logic.
Icy The Mage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2008, 01:52 AM // 01:52   #3
Desert Nomad
 
dilan155's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: living room
Profession: N/
Default

wow thats very detailed, very nice job. i dont see any errors that i can spot.
dilan155 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2008, 02:21 AM // 02:21   #4
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Default

just a thought, it would be nive to know how many chests we are missing in the "it makes it too lengthy part" just a thought
here to troll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2008, 03:31 AM // 03:31   #5
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Antares Ascending's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Profession: E/
Default

Nice work!! Definetly sticky material!
Antares Ascending is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2008, 05:28 AM // 05:28   #6
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: Hi Jinx Rage
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by here to troll View Post
just a thought, it would be nive to know how many chests we are missing in the "it makes it too lengthy part" just a thought
I took the numbers out to make the chart shorter, but the number you see is the "correct" sum. So the result is correct, I just added the note so that if anyone summed up my numbers they wouldn't wonder why they were getting a lower number.
skarhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2008, 10:15 AM // 10:15   #7
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Coney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Default

Presumably there's also a cost for the lucky/unlucky titles for each option. (as well as for the chest title, and gold ID).

Perhaps that's all boardwalk'd, but I find I 'd prefer opening NM chests to get lucky up... However, I end up opening mostly HM chests, as the loot drops are better there (and I don't just run 1.x minutes per chest without doing anything else - how mundane). Thus my high unlucky and low lucky title...

As to your valuations for golds/grapes, they make assumptions based on the fact that you'll be camping in kamadan, hope-spamming to sell (and hoarding items/mods/inscriptions). These days I pretty much just vendor 15%/x inscriptions on the golds they're on - the wasted time and inventory hassle isn't worth the supposed 500g/1k value that you *may eventually* get... If it's worth less than ~5k, it ain't worth trying to sell (IMHO). Now, on the other hand, if it's 250-stackable...

(unid gold ~700g, not 800g (you used 800, not 750) - and it takes a lot of time to sell them even at that price. Your purple values are more in line with vendor trash tho. I'm not sure I believe NM golds drop 25% - seems more like 13-16% to me, but I've not collected stats on 1000 NM chests =D. And HM gold drops seem more like 80-85% to me - again no stats, just feel...).

Last edited by Coney; Nov 26, 2008 at 10:30 AM // 10:30..
Coney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2008, 11:00 AM // 11:00   #8
Desert Nomad
 
tmakinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: www.mybearfriend.net
Guild: Servants of Fortuna [SoF]
Profession: E/
Default

First of all, you count the total number of chest opened in a most cumbersome and inaccurate way. The correct equation is N = P / (1 - R) where N is the total number of chests opened, P the number of picks and R the retain rate. E.g., with 250 picks and 90% retain rate the expected value would be 2500 and not 2487 as you suggest.

Second, there is a very detailed and in-depth (if somewhat old) analysis of the economy of chest running at the community works section.

Also: the mean value and gold to grape ratio of loot from normal mode chests depends on chest type. You are not going to get a 25% gold ratio from any chest with a 90% retain rate, even at maximal bonus.

Last edited by tmakinen; Nov 26, 2008 at 11:05 AM // 11:05..
tmakinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2008, 04:02 PM // 16:02   #9
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: Hi Jinx Rage
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tmakinen View Post
First of all, you count the total number of chest opened in a most cumbersome and inaccurate way. The correct equation is N = P / (1 - R) where N is the total number of chests opened, P the number of picks and R the retain rate. E.g., with 250 picks and 90% retain rate the expected value would be 2500 and not 2487 as you suggest.

Second, there is a very detailed and in-depth (if somewhat old) analysis of the economy of chest running at the community works section.

Also: the mean value and gold to grape ratio of loot from normal mode chests depends on chest type. You are not going to get a 25% gold ratio from any chest with a 90% retain rate, even at maximal bonus.
Thank you Tmakinen your analysis was much more indepth than mine. Mine was something I whipped up over my lunchbreak, and you obveously put alot more time and effort into yours. However I was merely looking to come up with rough ballpark figures, and after studying your analysis, I did get close to the mark, and in 1 easy to read page.

Hopefully mine will be of more use to the casual player, however if you want more exact and detailed information, Tmakinen's data is the place to go.

Thanks,

Skar

PS. I did catch the 750g vs 800g error I will try to get that fixed on my lunchbreak today.

Last edited by skarhand; Nov 26, 2008 at 04:06 PM // 16:06..
skarhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Corey's LockPicking Service corey54321 Services Offered 0 May 02, 2007 01:57 AM // 01:57
Drop of Fear Services Offered 15 Apr 30, 2007 02:48 AM // 02:48


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17 AM // 00:17.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("