Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:32 AM // 04:32   #261
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: DVDF
Profession: Mo/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier's haste
And you can probably bet that some people did. But yeah I agree with you, depends on how much you earned from this exploit, it wouldn't see fair for all that 2 years of gaming effort going down the drain.


But Anet probably wanted this as a stiff warning.....and they might or might not have their own reasons for banning people.


Well, take your anger out on Anet in this post while it's still open!
The person who told me about this exploit said that one of the people he knew had farmed up 19 armbraces in this fashion. It was then I knew that I needed to submit a support ticket about this and report my findings.

It's sad that I still got included in the same massive ban as these people.
Error of My Ways is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:37 AM // 04:37   #262
Forge Runner
 
Zeek Aran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Earth, sadly
Guild: BORK
Profession: A/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zehnchu
Yes, because if you have been playing that long you should have known better.
------------------------------------------------------
If you where unwillingly taken to this outpost then you should have left the moment you got there.
Human curiousity might keep you there. Whenever I find something new I think, "Did I miss something? Oh-well that's quite interesting!" and not "ZOMG HAXX *zones out*" and I've been here 23 months.
Zeek Aran is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:38 AM // 04:38   #263
Ascalonian Squire
 
pochoWICKED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Guild: [GoA]
Profession: Mo/
Thumbs up

Yea i was addicted to this game.
Now I'm done.
Ty Anet.
And for the rest of you.......
>>Say No To Mallyx =D<<
pochoWICKED is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:46 AM // 04:46   #264
DoH
Banned
 
DoH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Profession: W/A
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pochoWICKED
Yea i was addicted to this game.
Now I'm done.
Ty Anet.
And for the rest of you.......
>>Say No To Mallyx =D<<
I would do almost anything for my account back...
Heck i didn't even know this was an exploit
(but i guess my stupidity completely had the best of me)

I spent over 2500 hours of my life spent on this game.

I guess it was to good to be true i finally became decent at something, I do something that I was dragged into and I get banned.

This is my last post on this FLAME THREAD

If areana net could understand that most people were innocent and didn't know that this would cause problems.

I hope anet reconsiders for people that sent inquires

Thanks Anet, i guess i wount buy gw2 either cause my Hall of monuments is incomplete

QQ GG
If your gona flame, put urself in my shoes and see how I feel

<QQ>
DoH is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:51 AM // 04:51   #265
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Harrier's haste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Guild: ViLE
Profession: R/P
Default

And yes I know how these people feel.....but they can't just say "Oh, since everyone is complaining about the ban, we will lift it".

Time, solves everything =D
Harrier's haste is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:51 AM // 04:51   #266
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: May 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier's haste
Just because they banned 117 people? Give me a break lol
its going to be much more than 117 that won't be playing the game anymore, i know i won't be playing if my friends don't get unbanned whats the point, guild wars have continued to ban people trying to accomplish things gg
Tagne is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:52 AM // 04:52   #267
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Guild: In Christ Alone
Profession: N/Mo
Default

more than likly Anet left that outpost there for future testing. people who program do this alot. they hid it away in the .dat file thinking itwould be safe and left it at that. i dont think its Anets fault that people got banned its the peoples fault who decided to hack and .dat file to see what they could get out of it for theselves.

way to go ANET
kainmodious is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:54 AM // 04:54   #268
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IOWA
Guild: swat
Profession: Mo/
Default

These 117 people are not all hackers and I hope you all know this by know But really theres friends of these people and that spreads becuase that friend might of convinced more people to play so they are gonna actually losing possible customers for GW2
Azarr#1 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:57 AM // 04:57   #269
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Harrier's haste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Guild: ViLE
Profession: R/P
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azarr#1
These 117 people are not all hackers and I hope you all know this by know But really theres friends of these people and that spreads becuase that friend might of convinced more people to play so they are gonna actually losing possible customers for GW2

Why did you think I put this here? :
And yes I know how these people feel.....but they can't just say "Oh, since everyone is complaining about the ban, we will lift it".

But still, dunno about you but unless your friends are real ones, and good friends, how many of you can say, in all honesty, that you too, will quit GW for a online friend?


*Getting beaten by angry people ( )
Harrier's haste is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:58 AM // 04:58   #270
ArenaNet
 
Gaile Gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Default

I will share several bits of information, and then will read the other pages in the forum. But let me answer some of the many comments being offered here, all based on the position that was really pretty clearly detailed in today's Dev Update:
  • No one was banned for visiting the hidden outpost once. No one was banned even for going there a few times.
  • No one was banned for entering the mission, killing Mallyx, and taking the loot, even if they did that a few times.
  • In fact, the bar was set higher than a one-time or even few-time occurrence, as the Dev Update states, to avoid banning someone who was pulled there inadvertently or to avoid banning someone who might have thought he was helping by "testing" the exploit.
  • We have had protests saying something like, "But I only did it 4 times!"And the answer is, "You're right: You used the exploit 4 times. And then you used the exploit 20 more times on your other character."
  • There is a massive difference between ferrying someone to a known map and hacking the client to go to an inaccessible map, to take on a hero without having had to fight through four difficult challenges prior to that meeting. For in normal circumstances, by the time a party gets to Mallyx, they've taken damage, acquired DP, and spent a significant amount of time. The DoA mission requires talent, skill, and dedication. What challenge is there in skipping to the end scene? And would anyone honestly think that such a short-cut was allowed or intended?
  • For some, we see a pattern of movement to the outpost (sometimes after selling passage to others), entering the Mallyx room, killing him, then wash, rinse, and repeat. And boy oh boy, did some people repeat it!
  • Yes, we have records, and chat logs, and more. Obviously, anyone who hacked his client needs to be banned, and anyone using this exploit more than a few of times also needs to be banned. Let's not fine-grain this to who did the actual hacking -- the question is, did you benefit from using the hack?
  • The existence of the outpost -- in hidden form -- is required to offer the Domain of Anguish. This was not a "test" and the outpost absolutely could not be "deleted when we were finished with 'testing" or "saved on some storage device." So as directly as I can say it to those offering unfounded opinions: Deleting the outpost disables the entire Domain of Anguish mission. Therefore, let's be fair and not blame ArenaNet because someone hacked his client!
  • This exploit has nothing to do with texture changes or mods.
  • Now, to those who suggest that Support should give a warning before a block or ban, can you please tell me why that would be a good idea? Because I think I can tell you why it would be a poor idea: Giving a warning allows players time to shuffle their items to another account, to create a mule to carry the goods, or to sell them or give them away before they're caught. That means the economic impact remains, and it's the economic impact that we must prevent.
  • This exploit is not in any way a form of "farming." Whether someone used an exploit, or partied with someone who did, he were taken to a hidden outpost, which he could easily verify because (a) it was not on his map, (b) Mallyx, in normal gameplay, has no such outpost, and (c) he was almost certainly told it was an exploit, or told to keep it quiet, or sworn to secrecy. He was not farming, he was using or benefiting from the use of a serious exploit.
  • The length of the UA, or not reading it, is truly not a defense if one chooses to breach it.
  • Saying "They let such-and-such bug/glitch/exploit go, so they should just let everything go" has no foundation in logic. This was a significant exploit, higher in overall concern than someone ferrying another player to a legitimate high-level map. This is hacking the client; this is going to forbidden areas; this is gaining undeserved reward; this is profiting from selling the secret or selling a ferry; this is engaging in activities that can have long-ranging negative effect on the game economy.
We are always very sorry when we have to enact a ban on any account. Although 117 accounts is a very small number when you consider the numbers of those playing every day, it still causes us great distress to be placed in the position of having to enact such bans. After all, the last thing we want to do is turn away people who enjoy our game. I am personally very, very sad to see some names that I recognize involved in this exploit.

We do understand that some people will be angry about our actions, even if they were not personally involved in the exploit. I think we can all agree it's not a pleasant situation from any viewpoint. But we must put the game community as a whole above the interests of the individual player, when the actions of the individual player can have negative consequences upon all players. And that is what we have done.

Players who were banned may submit an appeal. Each such appeal will be carefully and respectfully researched and I truly hope that your personal situation is such that your account might be reinstated. But in all honesty, for quite a number on the ban list, that simply will not be possible. And as distressing as it is for more than the individual players involved, some players will find their ban must be upheld, for the good of the game.

Thank you to those who support ArenaNet in making this painful decision. And our sincere thanks to those who knew of this exploit and did not use it, or who kindly reported it to us directly, so that we could prevent a major impact upon the game about which all of us care so deeply.
__________________
Gaile Gray
Support Liaison
ArenaNet
Gaile Gray is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 04:59 AM // 04:59   #271
Ascalonian Squire
 
quicksilv3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SA, TX
Profession: R/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kainmodious
more than likly Anet left that outpost there for future testing. people who program do this alot. they hid it away in the .dat file thinking itwould be safe and left it at that. i dont think its Anets fault that people got banned its the peoples fault who decided to hack and .dat file to see what they could get out of it for theselves.

way to go ANET
bro there was no hackin .dat files!, if there was the server would of not let them bypass.. unless u know somethime i dont? pm.. plz
icall it more like defraging/checking 4 SPYWARE on the .dat file all files on MY PC!
quicksilv3r is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:01 AM // 05:01   #272
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Woop Shotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Guild: Ruthless Mafia [RM]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azarr#1
These 117 people are not all hackers and I hope you all know this by know But really theres friends of these people and that spreads becuase that friend might of convinced more people to play so they are gonna actually losing possible customers for GW2
Well I'm sure you know that if 117 customers don't buy their next game it's not going to matter to them.
Woop Shotty is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:07 AM // 05:07   #273
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: [ban]
Profession: P/W
Default

The problem is, i dont think this was a hack, i personaly think it was a secret handed down from above, in the user agreements it says nothing about a taxi to a place (much like a run to droks or a taxi to docks for better armour) no body has broken the t & c. there was many "bugs" like this and no one has been banned before
truzo 117 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:07 AM // 05:07   #274
Site Contributor
 
Neo Nugget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tagne
Thank you for the reply Gaile

Your response just made a ton of people quit guild wars.

Time to buy World of Warcraft
She said no one was banned by going there a few times. I guess you went there a lot judging on your reaction.

Gaile's post is completely valid.
__________________
"Even if the morrow is barren of promises,
nothing shall forestall my return."
Neo Nugget is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:09 AM // 05:09   #275
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: May 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo Nugget
She said no one was banned by going there a few times. I guess you went there a lot judging on your reaction.

Gaile's post is completely valid.

Nope, i never went there, didn't get banned, but almost everyone i know got banned. Whats the point of playing a game when your just going to get banned sooner or later?
Tagne is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:12 AM // 05:12   #276
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Jake_Steel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Guild: The Older Gamers (TOG)
Profession: N/Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tagne
Thank you for the reply Gaile

Your response just made a ton of people quit guild wars.

Time to buy World of Warcraft
The kind of people who quit over this are the kind of people we don't need or want in this community. Selfish, sneeaky, thieving people aren't to be mourned when they are removed. It's cancer removal, and who mourns a malignant tumor when it's removed?

Anet did the right thing, Gaile's post was proffessional and very informative. Doing the right thing and punishing the wicked always makes the wicked cry out. However, that doesn't mean the wicked aren't to be punished or that Anet didn't do the proper thing. They did and I stand by them for this decision.
Jake_Steel is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:12 AM // 05:12   #277
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Isle of Meditation
Profession: N/
Default

Just some take on the post by Gaile Grey:

Quote:
...... We also conducted a detailed investigation into who accessed this exploit and other hidden outposts.........we took into consideration extraordinary circumstances.....
ANet stated they didn't ban people who were "dragged " into this "HIDDEN outpost". If you were dragged into this hidden outpost once and got permanently banned then you should send a support ticket and should be unbanned IMO. If you were dragged into this hidden outpost multiple times and your account got banned then I am sorry to say that you probably deserved the ban (and I have the feeling you knew it was coming).

Quote:
.....maintaining the security of the game and protecting the game economy.....
Game economy, I cannot believe this has been going on for 5 months (as stated in this thread). Probabably those XXX armbraces should have tipped ANet off. Specially since I read somewhere that ANet can "smell if you farted in Lions Arch".

Hackers should be rightfully banned is a general consensus in this thread.
As for others it depends on their actions really IMO. Anet cannot know 100% who knew what they were doing was a bannable offense. But there are methods to distil this such as:
-whether you were "dragged" into this "hidden outpost" once or multiple times (see above),
-how long you have been playing the game (if you were new I probably wouldn't hold it against you, however if you have been playing this game for a long time and are active in guru or know about community boards then you probably should have known better).

If Anet says that she will look into these "extraordinary circumstances" then give ANet a chance. If you feel you were unjustly banned then email them a support ticket they will look into it.


Edit:
I was writing this and posted without seeing Gaile's reply. so I guess the right people were banned.

Last edited by yishin; Jan 11, 2008 at 05:17 AM // 05:17..
yishin is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:12 AM // 05:12   #278
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Profession: R/
Default

As much as people may not want to do it, this might help:

Tell Anet who was the first person to take you there so they can go up to ladder and punish the people who completely knew it was an exploit.

Promise to give the items that you got from the exploit back or in the trash

and promise never to return to the outpost.

IF this does work I'd except to be watched closely and held to your promises, so dont promise anything you WONT keep.

Just an opinion/sugguestion... I'm sad to lose friends in the game at the moment
geneva2589 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:13 AM // 05:13   #279
Desert Nomad
 
Phaern Majes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anywhere but up
Guild: The Panserbjorne [ROAR]
Profession: R/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tagne
Thank you for the reply Gaile

Your response just made a ton of people quit guild wars.

Time to buy World of Warcraft
How do you figure that? Anyone who quits a game because the an exploit is fixed and the people who abused it banded, won't be missed. WoW isn't a bad game but they do similar things when exploits happen, oh wait no they just close down their servers for a full day or so and still charge ya for it.

If the bar was set as high as Gaile said it was then anyone banded deserved it.
Phaern Majes is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:14 AM // 05:14   #280
Ascalonian Squire
 
quicksilv3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SA, TX
Profession: R/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo Nugget
She said no one was banned by going there a few times. I guess you went there a lot judging on your reaction.

Gaile's post is completely valid.
yes it is gg Gaile!

But that doent says nothing about a taxi to a place (much like a run to droks or a taxi to docks for better armour) no body has broken the t & c. there was many "bugs" like this and no one has been banned before-Quoted by truzo 117

same thing here no tweaking of clients, server side or host. just normal rans tele to locations!
and people where banned! trust me.

Last edited by quicksilv3r; Jan 11, 2008 at 05:17 AM // 05:17..
quicksilv3r is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Update: January 23 unienaule The Riverside Inn 15 Jan 25, 2006 01:57 AM // 01:57
Update - Friday, January 13 Ogg The Riverside Inn 2 Jan 14, 2006 01:17 AM // 01:17


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22 AM // 11:22.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("