Sep 08, 2007, 07:26 PM // 19:26
|
#1
|
über těk-nĭsh'ən
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Profession: R/
|
new laptop, correct performance?
i just got a new laptop. here are its specs:
core 2 duo T5450 1.66ghz
2gb ram
nvidia geforce 8400M GS 128mb
resolution: 1280x800
windows vista home premium
currently, with everything maxed out except shadow quality (medium) and AA x2, i can get 30-45 fps generally, and 25-30 fps in towns.
is this the normal performance for a laptop such as mine? i have nothing to compare it to right now.
|
|
|
Sep 08, 2007, 07:40 PM // 19:40
|
#2
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -... . .... .. -. -.. / -.-- --- ..-
|
yep its normal performance. I had nothing to compare my laptop too. I have a Dell Vostro 1500.
|
|
|
Sep 08, 2007, 09:26 PM // 21:26
|
#3
|
Site Legend
|
That's good for that card tbh
I get 30-35fps busy places, 50-60 elsewhere.
Specs:
Core2Duo [email protected]
2gb RAM
7950GTX 512MB
1680x1050
__________________
Old Skool '05
Last edited by Malice Black; Sep 09, 2007 at 12:21 PM // 12:21..
|
|
|
Sep 09, 2007, 01:16 AM // 01:16
|
#4
|
über těk-nĭsh'ən
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Profession: R/
|
i think the major limiting factor is the core 2 duo processor, since GW can only utilize one of the cores. i might be wrong though.
|
|
|
Sep 09, 2007, 12:19 PM // 12:19
|
#5
|
Site Legend
|
Limiting factor?
I don't know what kind of performance you were expecting, a 8400 is a low end card. Also, be aware that a laptop can go no higher then 60fps.
__________________
Old Skool '05
|
|
|
Sep 09, 2007, 02:50 PM // 14:50
|
#6
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Profession: R/
|
Even a single Core 2 Duo core should be perfectly adequate for the game. The only limiting factors in that computer are the video chip and Windows Vista.
|
|
|
Sep 09, 2007, 10:07 PM // 22:07
|
#7
|
über těk-nĭsh'ən
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Profession: R/
|
i just think it's very odd that my computer, depite with superior components (except maybe the gfx card), gets outperformed at GW by my friend's 3 year old pentium 4 (2.4ghz) with ATI radeon 9800PRO. yes, i know his graphics card is high end, but that's 2 generations old now.
|
|
|
Sep 10, 2007, 12:05 AM // 00:05
|
#8
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Profession: R/
|
There's nothing odd about the 8400 GS being slow at 1280x800 or any other reasonably high resolution. As usual with low-end cards its internal memory bus is badly crippled to save costs; only 64-bit, with max bandwidth around 9.6 GB/s. Compare to the 9800 Pro's 256-bit bus, bandwidth around 21.8 GB/s.
Two generations newer or not, the card still needs the data to process it, and that 64-bit memory bus doesn't deliver it very fast.
|
|
|
Sep 10, 2007, 07:37 AM // 07:37
|
#9
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: near SF, CA
|
My laptop is a Dell XPS M1710 w/ T7600 Core2Duo (2.33ghz) + NVidia GF Go7900GTX-512. It's able to hold 60fps @1920x1200 in all but the most crowded districts.
Although GW is only single-threaded, XP and Vista are both multi-processor aware operating systems. As a result, they can offload other tasks like internet browsers, virus scanners, defrag, etc... to the less-busy core while GW gets a core all to itself. This translates into better performance for both GW and the rest of the PC.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 AM // 09:49.
|